Following are graphs and commentary regarding the 2003 season of the Oakland Athletics. Questions or comments can be sent to me at dave@baseballgraphs.com.
| Move your mouse over this graph to view the status of each team at the season's midpoint (July 1st). | ||||
Fielding Independent Pitching is based on the following formula: (13*HR+3*BB-2*K)/IP. Defense Efficiency Ratio is (Non-catcher putouts/Batted Balls in Play), adjusted for ballpark. Circle sizes in this graph are proportional to the percent of fieldable balls successfully converted into outs by the fielders. |
The Athletics' Pitching and Fielding
Breaking down the runs allowed into its two key components: the A's pitching was third-best in the league, as measured by FIP. But the team DER was better than the two teams that had better FIP numbers (the Yankees and Red Sox). In contrast, the team with the second-least runs allowed, Seattle, had a higher FIP but even better fielding numbers than the A's. The A's strong DER appears to be a function of some pretty good (some would say lucky) pitching. Oakland's fielding was about average (as indicated by circle size), which means that the team DER is a result of the A's pitchers inducing "at 'em" balls. Looking at DER by pitcher: Foulke: .784, Zito: .766, Hudson: .754, Mulder: 723, Lilly: 714. How to Read this Graph |
Oakland Athletics' Win SharesPlayer Team Pos Hit Field Pitch Sum WS -------- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- --- M Tejada OAK SS 18.45 6.89 0.00 25.34 25 E Chavez OAK 3B 18.26 6.43 0.00 24.69 25 T Hudson OAK P 0.00 0.00 23.17 23.17 23 K Foulke OAK P 0.00 0.00 21.35 21.35 21 R Hernandez OAK C 10.70 7.97 0.00 18.67 19 M Ellis OAK 2B 9.16 8.66 0.00 17.82 18 B Zito OAK P 0.00 0.00 17.66 17.66 18 E Durazo OAK DH 16.54 0.38 0.00 16.91 17 M Mulder OAK P 0.00 0.00 16.91 16.91 17 E Byrnes OAK OF 12.10 3.39 0.00 15.48 16 S Hatteberg OAK 1B 12.31 1.69 0.00 14.00 14 T Long OAK OF 7.77 3.20 0.00 10.98 11 T Lilly OAK P 0.00 0.00 9.54 9.54 10 C Bradford OAK P 0.00 0.00 9.05 9.05 9 R Rincon OAK P 0.00 0.00 6.26 6.26 6 C Singleton OAK OF 3.31 2.76 0.00 6.07 6 B McMillon OAK OF 4.41 0.61 0.00 5.02 5 R Harden OAK P 0.00 0.00 4.09 4.09 4 A Melhuse OAK C 3.33 0.74 0.00 4.07 4 J Halama OAK P 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 4 J Guillen OAK OF 2.63 0.62 0.00 3.25 3 M Neu OAK P 0.00 0.00 2.79 2.79 3 F Menechino OAK 2B 1.05 1.14 0.00 2.19 2 J Dye OAK OF 0.00 1.52 0.00 1.52 2 A Piatt OAK OF 0.80 0.64 0.00 1.44 1 J Duchscherer OAK P 0.00 0.00 1.25 1.25 1 J Mecir OAK P 0.00 0.00 1.03 1.03 1 M Johnson OAK C 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.62 1 J Fikac OAK P 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 1 A Harang OAK P 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 1 E German OAK 2B 0.19 0.17 0.00 0.36 0 C Harville OAK P 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0 S Sparks OAK P 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0 M Edwards OAK OF 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.22 0 B Crosby OAK SS 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0 D McCarty OAK 1B 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.15 0 R Gant OAK OF 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.12 0 J Grabowski OAK OF 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0 G Koonce OAK 1B 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 0 M Bowie OAK P 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 M Wood OAK P 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 |
The A's Individual Players
Tejada and Chavez were on fire in the second half of the year. Chavez was the best third baseman in the league, and Tejada tied for second best. Ramon Hernandez quietly had a very good year and ranked as the third best catcher in the league. Mark Ellis was rated fourth at second base. (All rankings according to Win Shares) On the mound, Tim Hudson had a Cy Young type of year; he tied for most pitching Win Shares. Foulke was the highest rated reliever in the league, and Zito and Mulder (despite his injury) were also in the top twelve. By the way, the man for whom Foulke was traded (Billy Koch) had two Win Shares. The star of the first half was Eric Byrnes, who totally fell apart in the second half of the year. I believe he achieved all of those Win Shares in the first half. The A's one notable acquisition during the year, Jose Guillen, only contributed three Win Shares before being injured. Their one offseason pickup, Durazo, had a decent year with 17 Win Shares. The man for whom he was sort-of traded (Elmer Dessens) had seven. You can view all American League Win Shares data via the following links:All Players, Top to Bottom Players Ranked by Position Players Fielding WS by Position |