Zach Duke
The young Pirate lefthander, by request. If he keeps this up, watch out!
Duke, Zachary |
|
| | Net Runs per Ball | % of Batted Balls | %/OF | %/PA | Total Net Runs |
| BFP | OF | LD | GB | OF% | LD% | GB% | HR | K | BB | OF | LD | GB | IF | NIP | Tot | R/G |
| 2005 | 341 | -0.08 | 0.30 | -0.15 | 23% | 26% | 47% | 5% | 17% | 7% | -4.3 | 20.0 | -18.0 | -2.3 | -9.0 | -15.4 | -1.7 |
| Avg. | 341 | -0.08 | 0.30 | -0.15 | 23% | 26% | 47% | 5% | 17% | 7% | -4.3 | 20.0 | -18.0 | -2.3 | -9.0 | -15.3 | -1.7 |
| vs. MLB | | -0.11 | -0.05 | -0.05 | -8% | 6% | 3% | -6% | 0% | -2% | -6.9 | 2.0 | -7.3 | 0.3 | -2.7 | | |
Wells, Kip |
|
| | Net Runs per Ball | % of Batted Balls | %/OF | %/PA | Total Net Runs |
| BFP | OF | LD | GB | OF% | LD% | GB% | HR | K | BB | OF | LD | GB | IF | NIP | Tot | R/G |
| 2002 | 844 | 0.09 | 0.38 | -0.13 | 23% | 21% | 53% | 15% | 16% | 9% | 12.5 | 48.1 | -43.5 | -5.0 | -14.8 | -4.0 | -0.2 |
| 2003 | 835 | 0.03 | 0.40 | -0.12 | 28% | 18% | 51% | 13% | 18% | 10% | 5.4 | 41.3 | -36.0 | -4.5 | -16.7 | -14.8 | -0.7 |
| 2004 | 621 | 0.07 | 0.36 | -0.11 | 28% | 22% | 46% | 11% | 19% | 12% | 8.6 | 34.3 | -22.0 | -4.0 | -11.2 | 4.9 | 0.3 |
| 2005 | 828 | 0.12 | 0.31 | -0.11 | 31% | 22% | 45% | 13% | 16% | 13% | 21.0 | 37.8 | -27.8 | -4.3 | -3.7 | 20.3 | 0.9 |
| Avg. | 782 | 0.08 | 0.36 | -0.12 | 27% | 20% | 49% | 13% | 17% | 11% | 11.8 | 40.4 | -31.9 | -4.4 | -11.9 | 1.9 | 0.1 |
| vs. MLB | | 0.04 | 0.01 | -0.02 | -4% | 0% | 5% | 2% | 0% | 1% | 5.7 | -1.0 | -7.2 | 1.3 | 2.5 | | |
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 01/20 at 05:06 PM
Wow. Zach shows off well!
One other Pirate that I think would be interesting to look at would be Kip Wells. Kip has been labeled as one of the guys with the least amount of run support the last 3 or 4 years.
Kip has 68 QS in 121 starts and just a 1.66 per game ER allowed in those 68 games. When I compared Kip’s 53 non-quality starts (NQS) to Roger Clemens 63 NQS over that same 4 year span, I found just a .5 ER difference across Kip’s 53 games - or about 2.8 wins or so.
Now, Kip is no Roger Clemens and I’m not trying to infer that he is even close, but, if you graph out Kip for us, I believe his stats will show a whole different guy than the 55 - 69 loser he seems to be.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 01/20 at 10:48 PM
I’ve added Kip Wells to the post. He fits a fairly common stereotype: groundball pitcher who tends to give up home runs on outfield flies. His K/BB is league-average and his groundball tendency isn’t strong enough to offset those home runs. Overall, he’s a league-average guy (in other words, he’s worth $8 million a year).
He’s trended up the last four years: groundballs are down, walks are up, and he got killed last year by outfield flies.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 01/21 at 07:10 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
<< Back to main