Is it just me, or does it seem that WS doesn’t work as well at predicting HOF pitchers? The Unit and Pedro look to come in below a lot of the other candidates, yet seem much more likely to be enshrined than the guys surrounding them on the WS list.
Current Player’s HOF Chances
February 19, 2004
Here’s an article that looks at the Hall of Fame chances of current players, using Win Shares as the criterion.
Here’s an article that looks at the Hall of Fame chances of current players, using Win Shares as the criterion.
It includes a nice list of current player’s total Win Shares—I didn’t realize Mark Grace has so many.
Also, it reinforces the idea that pitchers should be judged on a different scale, as we’ve suggested in the replacement level article. Compare and contrast Steve Finley and Randy Johnson, for instance.
Don’t worry. This article is a lot shorter than Mike’s Hall of Fame series.
Yes, I agree, David. I think the biggest thing I’ve learned this offseason is the need to calculate win shares above average, or replacement level. James said as much in the book. This one simple step would do a lot to equalize the difference between players and pitchers.
Maybe I’ll go back and see if I can compute historic Win Shares Above Average. In my spare time…
Hehe, don’t sweat it. Just call this another brick in the WSAA vs. WS wall. ![]()
| <<Previous Article: A Fielding Analysis that's not all wet | Next Article: A Graphical History of Relief Pitching>> |

