WPA developments
May 01, 2006
Two big news items in the world of WPA
There are two “historic” landmarks today in the world of Win Probability Added.
- Tangotiger has published the methodology behind his Leverage Index at The Hardball Times. Leverage Index, as a spinoff of WPA, may actually be the most useful application of WPA. It measures the criticality of a situation and serves as a guide for relief pitching, pinch hitting and other in-game strategies. As far as I know, Doug Drinen was the first to publish such a measure. His was called “P,” and he published it in the late 1990’s in the Big, Bad Baseball Annual. P was based on the number of outs required to finish out the inning without a run scoring. Tango developed the Leverage Index a few years ago and published a number of fine related studies on his website, exhibiting the usefulness of LI. Then Keith Woolner appropriated Tango’s label but created his own definition of LI in the 2005 Baseball Prospectus, based on the difference in WP when one incremental run is allowed. In other words, Drinen’s methodology was based on incremental outs, Woolner’s was based on an incremental run. Tango’s system (actually, he has four different approaches) is based on the variability in outcomes OR the impact of an excellent hitter or pitcher on WPA. His approach is definitely the most sound of the three, and I encourage you to read the article.
- Fangraphs has improved its game WPA graphs, adding a box score below the graph (hey, David, score by inning would be huge. In your spare time…) which vastly improves the usefulness of the graphs. More importantly, David has also added running individual WPA totals to the team stats, so you can see who is leading each team in WPA. He also totals WPA by batting, starting and relieving, which is a superb “diagnostic” way of looking at a team. Those folks tracking WPA for each game and posting it on your websites, don’t give up! David is applying the “gross form” of WPA, which means that he isn’t adjusting WPA for the run environment and he isn’t splitting WPA credit between pitching and fielding. There’s is still real value in following a specific game and logging its WPA. But I’m not complaining; this is a tremendous step forward for baseball fans (whether they know it or not) and David deserves many thanks and praise.
| <<Previous Article: Book Review: "Stepping Up" | Next Article: Timeline graphic>> |

